 |
HRH Queen Elizabeth allows
a rare glimpse
at the Royal undies on the line
|
|
Details of the Queens entire annual underwear
budget have been revealed, prompting critics to demand the monarch
trim her spending.
Buckingham Palace said Wednesday that the figures, which showed
the Queen sized royal underpants cost each taxpayer just 0.003
pence a year, proved Queen Elizabeth and her household were providing
good value for money.
Amounting to around £4.11 per day, critics seized on details
of the £1,500 a year underpants bill.
Lawmaker Bill Rutford, a Labour Party
Fundraiser, said the monarchy provided "reasonable value" but called the expenditure
of luxury underwear as "indefensible".
"We ought to have more of the royals using normal shops
for their everyday expenses. I know for a fact that there are
perfectly comfortable women’s pants available in Matalan
for less than £4.00 for 3 pairs."
 |
Cover
of Mary Simpsons controversial book
|
|
A controversial new book by former Buckingham
Palace housemaid Mary Simpson has just been released, which looks
specifically at the flamboyant underwear tastes of the Royal
Family. Her book entitled 'The Royals Downstairs' gives stark
descriptions of the monarch’s underwear tastes
and demands.
"Quite frankly I am surprised she's only wasting £1,500
a year on her pant shopping, considering how many pairs she has",
explained Ms. Simpson, "she is obsessed with having the
newest styles as soon as they hit the cat walks. Sometimes she
would have new lines flown in directly from New York just so
she could have some before they became common"
Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse,
slammed the accusations made by Ms. Simpson, "This woman
is not to be trusted. She is making money through the abuse
of the highly trusted and respected
position of Royal underwear technician. She left the Palace after
a fall out with another member of staff and now she is trying
to make
money
with this nonsense.
"We have acknowledged that HRH could
cut back on some of the more expensive garments that she favours,
but to suggest
that the Queen of England should wear the same pair of pants
twice is quite ridiculous." |